The past weekend we took a rest from the eastern front and moved our forces to the beaches of Normany in June 1944. We played this time "Battle for Neuville" from the IABSM companion book Where the Hell Have You been Boys?, a collection of 21 scenarios of the battles around Omaha and Utah beaches in Normandy. And those were not the only news this week end: the remarkable one was that I finally played a game, after several weeks acting as umpire... so last Sunday "I was happy as a dog with twin tails", as the say goes in Spain, commanding a German kampfguppe.
How did I fare? That's for the last part of this post... and then you can leave your thoughts and comments about my performance.
Background
Morning June 6, 1944. Confusing reports hitting the local German command posts indicate that Allied parachutists fighting in a wide area behind the first coast line since last night. In particular St Mere Eglise seems to be in American hands, controlling an area as far as the north of Neuville-au-Plain. The German commnand orders a Kampfgruppe to move south, passing Neuville and to regain control of the critical cross roads at St Mere Eglise.
Forces involved and initial deployment
I was given the German side this time. My Kampfgruppe included 3 infantry platoons, an 80mm mortar section (playing a critical role in the game) and two HMGs, supported by a platoon of 3 Stug IIIs tanks. Moving off-table from the road at the north edge, the German player had to clear the road south at the end of the game with as many units as possible.
Initial American Deployment |
Game table - View from the South |
German Infantry Platoon and Blind (Stugs Platoon) |
German Deployment Plan |
Panzer March!! |
...triggering the first reaction from the US para forces...
Fire!! |
... unveiling the location of one ATG, the mortars and two infantry squads in the following turns.
Unluckily, the AT Gun crew failed to hit the German Stug the first time they fire, and I proceed to methodotically saturate with rifle, mortar, MMG and HE explosive fire until wiping it out of the table.
I gave orders then to one of the Stugs to move forward cautiously along the road, only to be almost inmediately attacked by a US infantry squad lying hidden ina hedgerow, fighting my tank at close quarters and supported with a bazooka team and a second AT Gun.
Despite the surprise, the tank could disengage soon with just a couple of shocks and some minor damage to the gun sights and engine.
These US units were now subject to another rain of lead and fire, breaking away and leaving almost no survivors and an abandoned AT gun. It was time now to move and finish the last pockets of resistance...
El Alamo? |
... so I decided to activate the two infantry platoons in reserve, crossing the river and moving under cover through the woods on my left flank. In the meantime, the HMG section was sent south leaving the battlefield unopposed, in order to start putting units out of the table.
All forces forward!! |
It was then that a new US blind emerged from the road's south edge, taking a defensive position in the house closest to the table edge. What to do now? ...Well, stop the game because ot was close to 2PM and lunch time in Spain ... and to my surprise the umpire called it a draw, because the victory conditions of the Americans were to hold the village at the end of the game but I at least cleared one unit south at the same time.
Positions at the end of the game |
That was odd: the victory conditions could produce a draw outcome easily, as the Americans did not have enough forces to cover the whole table edge and therefore the German units could break south bypassing the US strongholds.
A faulty scenario design? Here comes the irony: in fact I was DEFEATED despite a clear superior tactical performance (or at least I think so) in the game. Once at home, I read the full scenario text and realize that my orders were NOT to leave the table through the south edge BUT TO EXIT BREAKING THE ROAD SOUTH.
Therefore the brave Americans paratroopers held the village (although with high causalties and suffering) and St Mere Eglise eventually remained in the Allied hands. The actual historical battle outcome was not very different, as the Americans could hold the village for a longer period than expeted before being forced to retire south with 70% casualties.
Kuddos for IABSM, showing again the potential to fight historical scenarios and being a winner despite loosing the battle. Next weekend, back to Russia autumn 1941 with another decisive engagement of the Vyzma or Bust campaign
Given time, and a rereading of the victory conditions, you appeared to be well on your way to removing the Americans from the village.
ReplyDeleteProbably true, although at that stage I was looking to exit he table without much fighting, bypassing the village.
DeleteGreat AAR and very interesting scenario. I have not played IABSM but I'd really like to get my mits on this scenario book. Its a disease, really...
ReplyDeleteThere's agood bunch of excellent Scenario books at the TFL website. Remember these are for company-sized games
DeleteAssuming no additions to either sides forces and looking forward a couple of turns I'd have given you the victory.
ReplyDeleteNice tactics and report
Thanks Charles, it was in any case a very fun game. But as always, you need to fix the mind on the real objectives not on what you think they are
DeleteVery true Benito. But it is also important that your commander (the umpire/scenario manager)gives clear orders(objectives). Or did you let your attention wander?
DeleteNo I just misinterpreted the victory conditions (language barrier is also a problem from tiome to time): "clear the road south" was the specific statement in th scneario. I read it but what I internalise in my mind was "leaving the table south". My mistake...
DeleteMuy interesante el AAR. Y un gran trabajo por tu parte!
ReplyDeleteGracias Juan, la verdad es que lo disfruté un montón, hacía siglos que no jugaba una partida, arbitro mucho pero juego poco
DeleteTough luck Benito! I think your tactics and plan were very sound, and that you 'won' the actual fighting. However, it's true the victory conditions must be read and interpreted in a very strict way... so maybe circumstances robbed you of a deserved victory. 'The race is not always to the swift, or the battle to the strong, but that's the way you bet...'.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, totally agree with you.
DeleteHi there
ReplyDeleteAs usual a nice Battle report, and a nice blog all round.
Anyway, I just awarded you with the Liebster Blog Award, se my blog for more details.
http://miniatyrmannen.blogspot.se/2012/11/liebster-blog-award-for-me.html
Hope you don't mind. Cheers
/Joakim
Highly appreciated ant totally unmerited. A thousand thanks Joakim
DeleteThanks again for a great AAR. Most of our group is into FoW now so I have some work to do :-)
ReplyDeleteBig work indeed. I can't understand the attraction of FoW except for the glossie book
Delete